Pro-Growth vs. No-Growth
A wise though somewhat cynical man once said that the main reason there
are at least two sides to every issue is to give those who do not prevail
someone else to blame for their loss.
The oftentimes absurd futility of the human condition expressed by that
truism seems to me to be hard at work of late in the ongoing debate
between those who would have the Rim Country become Arizona's answer to
Aspen, and those who would prefer to see the region remain pretty much
the way it is.
One the one hand, we have a fairly sizable group of growth-oriented,
progressive individuals who clearly support the rapid development and
expansion of what they feel are the area's most valuable, yet-untapped
natural resources. They see the Rim Country as a second-home mecca for
upscale escapees from the Valley's summer heat, and as a year-round
outdoor playground due to its striking beauty and mild climate. Hard to
ignore, these folks come armed with glowing economic projections,
impressive demographic reports, and artist's conceptions of spectacular
developments to come.
On the other hand, we have a highly motivated and equally vocal assemblage,
adamantly opposed to what they consider the blatant exploitation for
profit of those same natural resources. This group is composed mostly of
long-time local and some not-just-local personalities who fear the
irretrievable loss of a pristine paradise. Arguments in this camp run the
gamut, from those of the affluent "we-got-ours" crowd, to those of the
conservative "controlled growth" proponents, many of whom are truly
concerned with the inevitability of some measure of esthetic
deterioration.
The fury with which these warriors publicly attack each other's positions
causes the observer to feel that he must choose one particular side of
this issue, that someone must be right, therefore, the other wrong.
Worse yet, the issue takes on such an air of importance that it tends to
make one forget that, regardless of who ostensibly wins the argument,
whether that victory occurs in the editorial pages or at a dinner party,
it may ultimately make little or no difference at all in the eventual
outcome of the issue.
I have come to understand that Mother Nature has a way of resolving many
of our merely mortal squabbles. Routinely horrendous earthquakes in neighboring
Southern California are textbook examples of how puny and insignificant
man's greatest efforts are to meaningfully shape his immediate
surroundings. Our best laid plans are transient at best, awaiting only
Fate's next shrug.
Despite the outcome of the Great Debate, regardless of how we think it
should be, this year will bring, courtesy of Mother Nature, yet another
new wave of Southern California refugees swarming into our Arizona cities
and towns. These will be real people, not just flickering, late night
images on CNN. And, along with the remains of their shaken lives, they
will be bringing with them their wants and needs, their dreams and
aspirations.
They will be in search of a new place to call home, one without
earthquakes, mud slides or race riots, a community in which to invest
their assets, a place to spend the rest of their lives. They will also
bring with them their talents, their ideas and their energies, all of
which are unquestionably the most valuable of all natural resources,
absolutely essential to any growing economy.
In response to this demand, we, as civilized people, regardless of how
firmly entrenched we think we are in our respective positions on the great
issues of our day, will first come to understand that there are indeed
certain things over which we have no control. Surviving that humbling
experience, we will then act responsibly and do the right thing. After all
the dust has settled, we will simply adjust accordingly, and get on to the
next debate.
PS: Want to see what things look like around here?
Take a cyber-stroll thru any one of our four Galleries in the RIMages
section of the site. Click the button and enjoy!